Lauren Weymouth: It’s no surprise direct mail is unpopular – who wants to donate to the waste problem?

Last week, I spent almost an hour searching online for an attractive-looking letter holder. At the request of my partner, I was on the hunt to find something that ‘looked nice’ but would also act as a more organised dwelling for Mount Mail, our never-ending pile of letters.

Mount Mail currently resides on the dining room table and – under the illusion that we receive any important documents – I agreed a letter holder was the solution to our paper problems. But last night, as I emptied our letterbox and attempted to finally tackle MM, I realised what our letter holder would really be used for: charity mail.

I split the letters up into piles: important documents; junk; charity mail and letters for a former tenant (who seemingly doesn’t have a letter holder either). It was at this point I realised over 70% of our all-important pile consisted of documents from charities. My partner donates to a lot of different charities, which is great, but the amount of post we receive as a result of it is becoming too much – even for me, who makes a living out of learning about what the sector is up to.

With this in mind, it didn’t surprise me that figures published in the Fundraising Regulator’s latest annual complaints report revealed complaints about direct mail are up by 20%. Over the past year, sending mail to donors generated 5,619 complaints, which is a significant increase on the 4,709 complaints reported the year before.

The charity sector is a huge force for good, but in the midst of a climate crisis, it also has an important role to play in helping people to better protect our planet. A big part of this is encouraging the reduction of non-essential waste.

Data recorded by the Global Forest Resource Assessment last year revealed 80,000 to 160,000 trees are cut down each year around the world, a large proportion of which are being used in the paper industry. The loss of trees is a huge problem for our planet and so it concerns me that charities – many of which are actively seeking to achieve environmental change – are still contributing to the issue by mailing out hundreds of thousands of letters every year.

There are of course a number of eco-friendly options, which rely on more environmentally conscious methods of production. But even recycling paper comes with its share of problems. For example, recycling paper reduces the demand for trees to be planted and still relies on electricity from fossil fuels during the production process.

Communication with supporters is essential and I’m certainly not campaigning for the abolition of paper (I am the editor of a print magazine), but given the number of complaints made about the frequency of direct mail – and the environmental impact it has – it is certainly worth charities thinking more carefully about the frequency of the letters they are sending out and understanding whether it’s truly necessary or effective. And if it is, perhaps reducing the frequency might increase the effectiveness.

We never did buy the aforementioned letter holder, and after finally tackling Mount Mail, we have no intention to, either. I love this sector and will always support it, but if I can find frustration in the overuse of paper through high-levels of direct mail – which arguably contradicts the sector’s goals for the planet – there is no surprise the average supporter might too.

    Share Story:

Recent Stories

How is the food and agricultural crisis affecting charity investment portfolios?
Charity Times editor, Lauren Weymouth, is joined by Jeneiv Shah, portfolio manager at Sarasin & Partners to discuss how the current pressures placed on agriculture and the wider food system is affecting charity investment portfolios.

Better Society