25/01/10
By Andrew Holt
A third of charity managers and trustees across the country are unaware of the Government's recently introduced requirements to vet staff and volunteers.
According to a new study published today by insurer Ecclesiastical, 32% of those surveyed said they were not aware of the new requirements to vet staff and volunteers introduced by the 2006 Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act.
Cultural charities were the least aware with 45% of managers and trustees saying they did not know about the new rules.
For youth charities the figure dropped to 20%.
16% of charity managers and trustees said they felt the introduction of the rules would deter new volunteers, while 6% said they felt it could have an impact on their existing volunteers' willingness to stay involved.
Asked whether they felt the Act would have the desired effect of increasing protection for vulnerable groups, a quarter (25%) said no, while a further 44% said they did not know.
The Vetting and Barring Scheme was introduced by the Government in October 2009.
Developed as a response to the Soham murders, the scheme applies to anyone working with children or vulnerable adults and requires them to have a criminal record check. Current estimates suggest that 11 million people will need to be checked by 2015.
Commenting on the study's results, Steve Wood, managing director of Ecclesiastical Insurance said: "We wanted to see how charities were dealing with the new vetting and barring rules because failure to implement them correctly could lead to litigation and significant costs for charities.
"While awareness of the requirements is high, particularly in the youth sector, there is clearly a significant group of managers and trustees who've yet to get to grips with the implications of the scheme for their organisations."
On an economic note, most charity managers and trustees (63%) believe that business will remain the same for them in 2010.
Almost a quarter (23%) predict improving financial conditions, while 8% expect things to get worse for their charity.
The study surveyed a representative sample of 142 charities.
Other stories you may find of interest:
Report: Drug services need to adapt to diverse communities
The latest UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC) report, published today, finds drug services of ‘little relevance’ to many in Britain’s diverse communities, including LGBT groups, disabled people and BME communities. The review The Impact of Drugs on Different Minority Groups: A review of the UK Literature, led by UKDPC Commissioner Professor Baroness Haleh Afshar, argues that a better understanding of drug use within diverse minority communities is needed to reduce drug problems and could also provide warning of ‘new’ or emergent patterns of drug use.
2010 Budget: cautiously positive from the sector
The chancellor's 2010 Budget received a cautiously positive response from the sector. The Government announced in the 2010 Budget Report that following a judgement by the European Court of Justice in January 2009, UK charity tax relief's will be extended to charities and Community Amateur Sports Clubs in the EU and in the European Economic Area countries of Norway and Iceland. In his Budget, the chancellor also announced the budget deficit had gone down from £178bn to £163bn, and cut growth forecasts. On public spending, he announced £5 billion in savings
Charity recruited known sex offender as CEO
The Charity Commission suspended the chief executive of a disability charity revealing his employers knew of his offences as a convicted sex offender but refused to carry out a Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) check. The Commission received a complaint jointly from two Councils relating to the Charity. It was alleged that the charity trustees had knowingly employed a convicted sex offender and refused to carry out Criminal Records Bureau ('CRB') checks in the belief that such checks are an invasion of privacy despite having signed a contract with one of the Councils which stipulates that charity staff should be CRB checked. The allegation related to the convicted sex offender 'A', who had been employed by the Charity as its Chief Executive Officer from January 2009 until 'A' was suspended in April 2009 by the Charity Commission and subsequently by the Charity.
