21/08/09

By Andrew Holt

The Institute of Fundraising (IOF)is backing the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association (PFRA) in the light of reports of differences of opinion about face-to-face fundraising between the PFRA and Wandsworth Council.

When carried out according to best practice standards established by the Institute of Fundraising, face-to-face fundraising is highly effective - for instance, members of the Public Fundraising Regulatory Association recruited 681,000 new donors in 2008/09, representing a pledge value of £70m.

IOF says this is a valuable and highly cost effective source of income to many UK charities, and allows fundraisers to engage with a different demographic of donor.

People have a choice of how and where they support charity - and on the street is one place they might wish to do so. Fundraisers should have the right to ask for support from donors and potential donors, to ensure that they are best able to provide for beneficiaries.

Louise Richards, director of policy and campaigns at the Institute of Fundraising, said: "We are pleased to support the PFRA and its role in the regulation of face-to-face fundraising, in the light of recent negative press reports about face-to-face as a fundraising method.

"In this particular instance, we have some concerns about the way in which Wandsworth Council has responded to this situation. If, as the Council suggests, businesses and residents have an issue with face-to-face fundraising, where is the evidence of these complaints?

"Why has Wandsworth Council not taken these complaints to the Fundraising Standards Board, which runs the self-regulation scheme for fundraising bodies in the UK and adjudicates complaints against the rigorous best practice standards set by the Institute of Fundraising?"

Home     More News


Other stories you may find of interest:

David Cameron: Leadership for a better Britain
David Cameron put the Big Society at the heart of his keynote conference speech yesterday, stating: "My driving mission in politics is to build a Big Society, a stronger society." He said: "It starts with families. I want to make this the most family-friendly government the country has ever seen. More childcare. More health visitors. More relationship support. More help with parenting. And for the 120,000 families that are most troubled - and causing the most trouble - a commitment to turn their lives around by the end of this Parliament."

Budget 2011: Sector verdict is broadly positive
The sector has given its verdict on the budget, and there is much positive comment, but this is tempered by some disappointment and criticism. The Chancellor’s budget speech did herald some significant – and in some cases unexpected – changes to the reliefs available for charities and philanthropists. Key measures announced in the Budget include proposals to simplify Gift Aid, encourage wealthy people to give more to charity...

Sector expresses disappointment at 2012 Budget
After last year’s positive Budget for charities, the sector has expressed deep disappointment at the Chancellor George Osborne's 2012 Budget. The CFG described it as a budget for business, CAF warned tax changes could strangle major donations, the Charity Tax Group said it was very concerned about some of the Budget announcements, law firm Withers warned that the Budget could be a significant attack on charity funding, NCVO said this is not “George’s Marvellous Medicine” for the charity sector, NAVCA has warned the budget should have gone further, ACEVO is worried by the cap on tax reliefs, Citizens Advice Scotland has said there is nothing in the Budget to help people struggling and Justice for All said the budget revealed there is no long term plan for the advice sector.