|
Responses have already started coming in to the publication of the Joint
Committee’s report on the Draft Charities Bill.
The report makes a
total of 52 recommendations and runs to more than 200 pages.
In a statement Home
Office Minister Fiona Mactaggart welcomed the report from the committee,
adding that she was “grateful for their thorough and knowledgeable
inquiry”.
The report showed
“widespread support for the principle that public benefit should
be the bedrock of charitable status, regulated by a strengthened, independent
Charity Commission”, she said.
In its response, the
NCVO also welcomed the report, saying it “clearly demonstrates that
the Joint Committee has carried out pre-legislative scrutiny with integrity
and rigour”.
“Public benefit
has been put at the centre of this legislation and the Committee pulls
no punches over the need for existing charities to demonstrate what public
benefit they provide,” a statement reads.
“The report
also clarifies the role of the Charity Commission in both enforcing public
benefit and providing advice where it directly relates to regulatory issues.”
It also notes support for “the complete removal of the deeply unpopular
economic and social impact powers”, referring to suggestions in
the bill that the commission should be charged with ensuring charities
maximize their “social and economic impact”.
The Charity Commission,
however, said it “warmly welcomes” the report. “We are
delighted to see the Committee’s focus on maintaining the independence
of the sector and encouraging active citizenship,” said commission
chair Geraldine Peacock.
The Institute of Fundraising
is also largely positive about the recommendations, although it warns
of “details still to be ironed out”.
Among its recommendations
that the committee accepted were that: the Home Office should publish
the criteria against which it will judge the success of self-regulation
(the IoF have taken the lead in developing a system of self-regulation);
and that the public should be informed if a fundraiser is paid, whether
they are employed by a charity or are sub-contracted.
Andrew Watt, head
of policy, said: “We urge Government to ensure a productive outcome
when the Bill becomes law.”
On face-to-face fundraising,
the PFRA also welcomed the report, particularly the recommendation that
the Charity Commission rather than local authorities should act as the
lead authority in granting certificates of fitness to carry out public
collections.
Finally, both the
Charity Finance Directors Group (CFDG) and the Association of Chief Executives
of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) praised the committee for recommending
that the rules for charities trading be relaxed. When it came to drawing
up the draft bill, the Home Office had rejected the Strategy Unit’s
recommendation in Private Action, Public Benefit that charities be allowed
to trade without setting up a subsidiary.
Stephen Bubb, chief
executive of ACEVO, said "We're particularly delighted that the committee
has revisted the clauses on trading. This area is ripe for reform, as
current rules and regulations verge on the nonsensical."
For
full responses, click
here
|