|
The Association of Chief
Executives of Voluntary Organisations (ACEVO) today launches a new publication
calling for the appointment of a third sector Cabinet Minister and "Tsar”
to help give charities more sway within public service reform.
Charities don’t
want charity, ACEVO’s voluntary sector “manifesto”
for the next General Election argues that many of its members want to
play a bigger role in both designing and delivering public services but
due to current procurement policies barriers are created which often result
in poor outcomes for users. The new positions would allow the government’s
work with charities and not-for-profit organisations to be better managed,
thus leading to more successful service performance.
Stephen Bubb, chief
executive of ACEVO, says: “The sector can deliver many key public
services more effectively and at better value than the state. We want
to be part of radical solutions in mainstream public service delivery,
not just tinkering on the edges. This would lead to a more streamlined
civil service, and better use of public money.
“This agenda
can only be delivered by a Cabinet Minister, supported by a Charity Tsar
and top level civil service team.”
Beth Breeze, deputy
director of the Institute for Philanthropy and an adviser on the development
of the manifesto, says: “Politicians reading ACEVO’s manifesto
are in for a surprise. They might expect charity chief executives to be
lobbying for special treatment or putting out the begging bowl. But in
fact they are simply asking all political parties to take reasonable steps
to give charities the support they need to fulfil their missions.”
The manifesto contains
a total of 10 proposals that focus on modernising and professionalising
charities and not-for-profit organisations. It follows the Efficiency
Review, an independent consultation into the way government does business
by Sir Peter Gershon, which recommended the development of a more efficient
relationship between government and the sector. The sector had originally
been omitted from the Review’s remit until intensive lobbying by
charity ceo’s resulted in this decision being reversed.
|