| Five
major third sector bodies have joined together to call for
the National Hubs of Expertise to be stripped of their commissioning
role.
In a joint letter addressed to chair of Capacitybuilders
Chris Pond, the chief executives of Acevo, ACRE, Bassac,
CDFA and the DTA have voiced support for the recommendations
of the Durning Report, calling for a full review of the
ChangeUp programme and minimising the role of the hubs.
The letter, dated 2 October, said: “In particular,
we support the recommendation that Capacitybuilders should
provide strategic leadership and coordination of the ChangeUp
programme as a whole, taking responsibility for the commissioning
and procurement of national programmes. In doing so, Capacitybuilders
should actively seek advice from the sector as a whole,
as well as the hubs.”
It warned that the hubs’ role had become confused.
“The fundamental structural problem for the hubs relates
to their multiple and conflicting roles,” the letter
said. “This situation, in which each hub is commissioner,
purchaser, and provider, has exacerbated conflicts of interest
and complicated the roles of partners.”
The joint statement said that after a restructure the hubs’
role should concentrate on advising Capacitybuilders, other
funders and the whole sector on strategic priorities, as
well as acting as a centre of excellence for the promotion
and dissemination of good practice.
But organisations working closely with the hubs, including
NCVO, have been critical of the proposals contained in the
Durning Report (Charity
Times, 8 September 2006). “I share the widespread
concern within the sector about the option of Capacitybuilders
– a government agency – directly commissioning
all national programmes,” said Ben Kernighan, director
of services and development at the NCVO. “For this
to happen Capacitybuilders would need to increase its own
funding, at the expense of the voluntary and community sector,
without this decision being open to external scrutiny.”
|