The burden of regulation on the charity sector is stifling innovation
and wasting resources, and changes are needed if organisations are to
design and deliver more imaginative, effective approaches to society’s
problems.
This was the message
of the Better Regulation Taskforce today as it launched the results from
its study Better Regulation for Civil Society: Making life easier
for those who help others.
The report found that
while regulation is necessary to protect the public and to uphold standards,
voluntary and community organisations face a disproportionate amount of
red tape. Focusing on three priorities: volunteers; social innovation;
and meeting need, eleven recommendations for change were made that the
Taskforce believe will help level the playing field for the sector. These
include:
• reforming
voluntary and community sector (VCS)-specific regulation such as that
from the Charity Commission and HRMC. For example, the taskforce recommends
amalgamating the two separate reports charities have to provide both the
commission and Guidestar;
• reforming general regulation, such as Schedule 1 of the Housing
Act, which prohibits housing associations from granting non-contractual
payments or benefits to staff, board members or their families. The report
says that while this has good intentions, it has become a “bureaucratic
exercise for both associations and the Housing Corporation and is ripe
for reform”; and
• reforming quasi-regulation with regards funding opportunities.
One example given is that the government works with bodies such as local
authorities, Primary Care Trusts and the Learning and Skills Council to
reduce the administrative burdens arising from voluntary sector contracts.
Sukhvinder Stubbs,
chair of the taskforce’s sub-group, said: “Some regulation
is needed to prevent bad people doing bad things, but this should be proportionate
and should not impair the work being done. We hope our recommendations
will help regulation support not stifle grass roots organisations, and
change public service contracts for the better.
“This is an
opportunity for quite radical change. However, for the recommendations
to be implemented, the sector needs to get behind the report and lobby
government, otherwise nothing will change,” she added.
The government is
due to comment on the findings in 60 days, however, Paul Goggins the charities
minister, has already expressed his support. Speaking at the launch, he
said: “I am concerned about the regulatory burden on charities and
want to create a step change in the role VCS organisations play within
public service delivery. I will be looking at the recommendations to see
if we can include them in the work we are doing in this area.”
The Better Regulation
Executive has launched an online service for stakeholders to submit proposals
to government, and the sector is being urged to give its views on any
unnecessary regulatory burdens that could be simplified or eliminated.
Visit www.betterregulation.gov.uk
for details.