Search
 

Campaign to define divide between Lottery and government spending 16/03/06
 

The need to draw a line between government spending and the distribution of National Lottery funds has been emphasised by a campaign to amend the National Lottery Bill, currently passing through Parliament.

The NCVO and the National Campaign for the Arts (NCA) backed an amendment to the Bill, tabled by the Liberal Democrat peer Lord Clement-Jones during the House of Lords’ debate on 13 March, to ensure bodies distributing Lottery funds report on how they have maintained independence from government, thus making certain that Lottery money is additional to, not a replacement for, government spending. Another day of debate in the House of Lords Committee has been scheduled for Tuesday 21 March to continue the process of working through the proposed amendments.

A spokesperson for the NCVO said the organisation was pleased, but not entirely satisfied, with the outcome of the debate on 13 March. “We didn’t really get the movement from the government that we’d hoped for,” she said. “With additionality a common law definition was discussed, and that wasn’t quite the definition that we would be seeking. We will continue to work with the NCA on that.”

The move follows condemnation from the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee of the way Lottery money has been used to fund government initiatives.

A spokesperson for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) said the department has maintained close links with both the NCVO and the NCA during the passage of the National Lottery Bill, and that it has been working closely with the chief executives of the distributing bodies to agree a number of measures. These include:

  • a common framework for reporting on the principle of additionality which will comprise each Lottery distributing body’s own policy on additionality, how this informs the design of their funding programmes, and how it works at the grant giving level
  • a common interpretation of the principle of additionality as follows: “Lottery funding is distinct from government expenditure. Where appropriate it complements government and other programmes, policies and funding”
  • a confirmation that annual reports will be the main vehicle for reporting on additionality.
    “We feel that these additional commitments on the part of the distributors should meet the concerns people have expressed,” said the spokesperson.
 
current magazine cover
 
 
 Home
 News
 E Newsalert 
 Events
 Subscribe
 Charity services
 Past issues
 Factsheets
 Site map
 
 
navigation jobs
navigation UK Charity Awards
navigation Charity Buyers Guide
 
 

The Pensions Trust