|
The Tsunami Recovery
Network has produced a report on recovery programmes and progress made
in the regions stricken by the December disaster.
The report shows
how, six months on, the $8.5bn pledged in aid has been allocated, what
has already been spent on short-term relief, and the lack of influence
the communities affected have had in this process. Many of those most
directly affected by the disaster are still without permanent homes, a
situation arising from government plans for physical and economic development
being bogged down in bureaucratic and political procedures, the report
said.
The review acknowledges
that immediate relief programmes have been well received, but reconstruction
plans have yet to emerge and are characterised by a lack of trust and
consultation between government and locals. The extent of permanent, long-term
reconstruction has been virtually non-existent, with communities unable
to return to their land. This is partly explained by reports sent to the
Network concerning disputes between government in Thailand, Indonesia,
India and Sri Lanka and their costal communities. The reports claim that
government is actively preventing the return of these communities, and
offering support to commercial investment instead on the grounds of ‘tourist
and economic development’.
The charities
entrusted with spending the £350 million donated by the UK public
have reported on the first six months of their activity, but it is impossible
to say from these reports how much has been spent, how many people have
benefited and in what way. A similar situation exists with the reports
from the international co-ordinating bodies as there is no simple and
common framework for reporting, making overall accountability virtually
impossible.
Network steering
group member Tony Lloyd-Jones, architect-planner and senior researcher
at the University of Westminster’s Max Lock Centre, said that unprecedented
amounts of money have been made available for aid, and efforts have been
made to meet the immediate and longer-term needs of survivors.
“But what
this report does highlight is that six months on from one of the most
devastating disasters the world has ever seen, many communities feel they
are being excluded from decisions on redevelopment and still continue
to live without a roof on their head and an uncertain future,” he
said.
“From
the start we have given emphasis in our monitoring to the rights and participation
of affected communities. We also aim to track the transparency of the
process of transfer from emergency relief to sustained development in
terms of access to resources and long-term planning."
Many charities fear
that stories about the improper use of tsunami funds will damage public
trust and confidence, according to a recent survey by the Institute of
Fundraising. In the second phase of its study into the effects of the
tsunami appeal on fundraising, it found that 49.2% of respondents felt
negative reporting would impact on their fundraising over the long-term.
The survey also discovered
that in the six months following the tsunami, 58.3% of charities have
succeeded in increasing or maintaining income at the same levels as those
attained during the same period in 2004, and have also experienced an
increase in the use of Gift Aid and Committed Giving. However, a large
number of organisations have seen a fall in corporate donations.
Lindsay Boswell, chief
executive of the Institute, said: "The tsunami appeal has been a
real testament to the generosity of UK donors but it has been a major
worry to many charities who have been concerned how they can compete against
the media attention around this campaign.
"These results
are largely heartening. Where charities have seen a fall in income the
general view is that it will be short lived, meanwhile the benefits from
increased take-up around Gift Aid and committed giving should be felt
for years to come."
A summary of the report
can be found via www.institute-of-fundraising.org.uk
with the full details being released at the Institute's National Convention
on Monday 11 July.
|