|
Concerns about new powers
in the draft Charities Bill for the Charity Commission to take into account
charities' "social and economic impact" are groundless, according to the
Charity Commission.
The commission's director
of policy Rosie Chapman argues that the new objective would merely clarify
the commission's existing role. "Our take on this is that it's about enabling,
rather than assessing, and brings up to date our current objective of
maximising the effectiveness of charities," she writes in a letter sent
to Charities Times Online.
"I'd like to reassure
charities that we don't intend this to be yet another test exercise for
them, but a practical and modern objective which enables us to take into
account the wider impact of the work they do in the real world.
NCVO has expressed
concerns that the regulatory objective in the bill may become a "back-door
route" to defining public benefit.
Although most will
be able to show a social benefit, it says the economic benefit of most
charities is likely to be incidental to their work. The group is trying
to persuade the Government to drop the objective from the bill, which
is currently undergoing pre-legislative scrutiny, and replace it with
the phrase: "maximising public benefit".
To see the letter,
visit our feedback section or click this link
|