| The
British public is divided over whether charities should deliver
more public services, figures from nfpSynergy’s Charity
Awareness Monitor have shown.
A third (32%) of respondents to the survey said they were
against charities providing more services, another third
(30%) said they were in favour of increased third sector
delivery with the majority (38%) saying they remained unsure.
But while 46% of the public are happy to support service
providing charities, those in receipt of government subsidy
could find that their donor income is affected – one
in five said they would be less likely to donate, and one
in 20 said they simply wouldn’t give, to a charity
receiving an income from the government.
The type of work carried out by the charity also made a
difference to attitudes about public service delivery. Respondents
preferred for national charities to deliver aid overseas
(69% agreed), but providing activities for children is still
seen as a job for the local authority (59%).
In many cases it was found that the public preferred the
service deliverer to be local, whether or not it was a charitable
or public sector provider. In providing services for homeless
people, for example, local authorities were the first choice
and a local charity the second choice.
“British charities are increasingly finding themselves
caught between the devil and the deep blue sea,” said
nfpSynergy’s driver of ideas Joe Saxton. “On
the one hand the public trusts them so much that they are
keen for them to play an even bigger role in delivering
crucial public services, especially in certain areas of
work. Yet, on the other hand, if the government were to
fund them in providing such services many of the public
say they would be less inclined to donate to the charities
themselves.”
|