|
The Charity Commission has published a regulatory case
report today stating that the charity RUSI (Royal United
Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies) inadvertently
gave support to a Liberal Democrat MP and the Liberal Democrat
party through a research project that the MP commissioned
the charity to undertake.
The issue came to light when the Electoral Commission made
a referral to the Charity Commission, giving information
that the MP had used a donation to commission research from
the charity.
This research paper related to the ‘Military Covenant’
and was used for a Liberal Democrat party political paper,
written by Sir Menzies Campbell MP, entitled ‘No Choice
but Change’ and published on 26 September 2008.
This raised concerns for the Charity Commission that the
charity may have supported a politician and/or political
party, and had acted in a way which could call into question
the charity’s independence from party politics.
It was also unclear whether the charity research had been
used by the charity for the public benefit because of its
limited dissemination.
These issues had the potential to constitute infringements
of the charity trustees’ duties and responsibilities
and the Commission’s published guidance, including
guidance on charities engaging in political activities,
and therefore warranted further investigation.
The Charity Commission opened an investigation in March
2009 and today has published its findings in a report at
www.charitycommission.gov.uk.
Sir Menzies Campbell MP was unaware of any concerns which
might have arisen from the charity undertaking the research.
The Commission’s investigation focused only on how
the trustees discharged their responsibilities and duties
under charity law.
The Commission concluded that it was difficult to see how
the trustees had discharged their legal duties and responsibilities
to the charity in making the decision to undertake the research
commissioned exclusively by and for the MP.
The Commission therefore concluded in its report that in
accepting the commission from the MP, the charity inadvertently
gave support to the MP and the Liberal Democrat party in
a party political context.
This was not appropriate, nor an activity that furthered
RUSI’s charitable objectives for the public benefit
as the material was not made publicly available.
The Commission provided the charity with advice and guidance
regarding the legal and regulatory requirements that must
be complied with by charities engaging in the political
environment.
Additional regulatory advice and guidance relating to requests
to undertake research from political parties and/or politicians
was also provided.
As a result of the Commission’s intervention, the
charity has amended its own internal policies and staff
procedures regarding interaction with politicians and political
parties to ensure that a similar situation does not occur
in the future.
The charity cooperated fully with the Commission’s
enquiries throughout and has welcomed the regulatory advice
and guidance the Commission has provided.
In its regulatory case report, the Commission reminds charities
that it is a fundamental principle that charities must remain
independent from party politics and cannot give specific
support to a political party, politician or political candidate.
The Commission provides guidance for Higher Education Institutions
on research, which can be found at http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/supportingcharities/higherres.asp
as well as charities and political donations, and guidance
on Charities and Campaigning called Speaking Out on its
website at www.charitycommission.gov.uk.
|