|
Charities, including independent charitable schools, could
have up to five years to make any necessary changes if they
are not currently meeting the public benefit requirement
which now applies to all charities, the chair of the Charity
Commission Dame Suzi Leather has affirmed to schools.
Following the Charities Act 2006, charities that advance
religion, education and relieve or prevent poverty are no
longer automatically charitable in law, but are required
to show the public benefit they provide, in line with all
other charities.
This includes independent charitable schools.
The majority of twelve charities recently assessed by the
Charity Commission were found to already be meeting the
public benefit requirement.
The charities that were not currently meeting the requirement
were given three months to consider the assessments and
respond, and a further nine months to provide the Commission
with a plan saying what they intended to do, and sufficient
time to implement it.
On how long a charity which was not currently meeting the
requirement might have to make any changes, Dame Suzi said:
“While we are certainly looking for a demonstrable
commitment, year on year, to satisfying the public benefit
requirement, where we judge that a charity needs an extended
period of time to make the necessary changes, we will be
prepared to give that charity time.
"We would not normally expect that period to be longer
than five years. We recognise developing partnership activities
or building up a bursaries fund will take time. We also
recognise that in the current economic climate it is more
difficult. We know you can’t pull a rabbit out of
the hat.”
Speaking at the Headmasters and Headmistresses Conference,
Dame Suzi said that the Commission did not “inhabit
a parallel universe or stand aloof from the realities of
running an organisation”.
She added; “We understand not all charitable independent
schools have large endowments. That many parents find it
difficult to pay the fees. That it’s not always easy
to bridge the divide between the educational sectors and
build relationships with neighbouring schools. These issues
are not academic, if you’ll excuse the pun, and we
recognise what many of you are up against.”
Dame Suzi Leather also addressed questions that have been
raised about the Charity Commission’s interpretation
of the law and explained that the legal basis for its guidance
and approach was very clear.
“The (Charities) Act preserves the current case law,
and our guidance is based on it. The law is not static,
and we have had to consider how the legal authorities, many
of which were decided in a different social climate, should
be interpreted in a modern context. We have set out our
legal reasoning clearly and carefully alongside our guidance.
We have seen no legal argument to the contrary that causes
us to change our analysis."
She added: “There is no doubt that, in due course,
the law in this area will be reviewed and clarified by the
Tribunal and the Courts. We accept and welcome this as part
of the process of the rational development of the law. Unless
and until this happens, and our legal interpretation is
overturned, then we are all working with the public benefit
reporting requirement and our guidance with regard to the
operation of the principles as they stand.”
Dame Suzi also addressed the issue of how frequently charities,
including independent schools, might expect to be assessed
by the Commission.
“For all but the handful of charities which feature
in our ongoing assessment programme, the answer is never.
It is not principally by individual assessments that we,
or the public, will know about the depth and breadth of
public benefit being delivered by these thousands of charities
- but by what these charities tell us in their Trustee Annual
Reports.”
The chair rebutted claims that the Commission has not been
acting independently in its approach to public benefit.
“There are some who seem determined to believe that
the Charity Commission is politically motivated. This is,
as we have repeatedly said, untrue. The Commission, let
me remind you, is independent of Ministers and accountable
not to the Government of the day but to Parliament, and
through Parliament, to the wider public.
"Our motivation comes straight from one of the statutory
objectives we are charged by Parliament to deliver - to
promote awareness and understanding of the operation of
the public benefit requirement. We are the regulator and
under the Charities Act this is our responsibility."
She ended by telling schools that she expected that the
public benefit requirement would “show how with no
fanfare so many of you have quietly, long before the new
Act, been getting on with the business of widening access
to the life-changing opportunities that education at your
school brings. They are your achievements. You, I am sure,
will far exceed our expectations.”
|