When
did charities become so studious? Earlier this year the government
pledged to create a Third Sector Research Centre that would
increase the sector’s academic standing.
Then came the idea of a Third Sector University to develop
the graduate skills base. And more and more charity managers
are looking to professionalise, according to Seb Elseworth,
head of policy at Acevo, which mooted the university idea.
“Stakeholder management is one thing that charities
often find difficult, [so] business qualifications are enormously
valuable,” he says. “You’d be hard pushed
to think of a public or private sector organisation with so
many relationships to manage.”
Businesses have long been aware of several core areas in which
any management professional needs to be adept: marketing,
strategy, finance, human resources, hence its trademark Masters
in Business Administration (MBA).
But in the past five years a new breed of qualification has
sprung up: the Masters in Voluntary Administration (MVA),
or MSc in Voluntary Sector Management; management education
tailored to the voluntary sector.
It’s here that the debate begins. As charities become
larger, rubbing shoulders and competing with business and
the public sector, gaining a professional badge seems like
a very good idea. But why would a charity professional do
a course aimed at business? Conversely, is there value in
a charity qualification that few have heard of?
MBAs
Cranfield School of Management has offered an MBA for 45
years. Séan Rickard, the full time MBA director,
is adamant that the business qualification is relevant for
charity professionals.
“You do an MBA to learn how to manage people. The
problems are nothing to do with the sector you’re
in, profit or non-profit,” he says.
Dedicating a course to charity issues means less time is
spent on management, finance and marketing, he says. “If
you take a third of the course to concentrate on the voluntary
sector, the corollary is that you end up with something
pretty half-baked.”
A primary reason for doing an MBA is networking. Rickard
argues that being among business students encourages the
exchange of ideas. “It’s marvellous to have
people with different values, it’s a much richer learning
environment.”
In this respect, tailored courses are too narrow, he says,
citing British Airways’ short-lived decision to run
an MBA. “You end up talking about problems you’re
all aware of [and] bringing up the same old solutions. It
works very well for charity professionals to hear what goes
on in other sectors of the economy.”
MBAs’ notoriously high fees may be off-putting: Cranfield
charges £28,000. But each year the business school
offers two scholarships for its executive (part time) MBA.
Previous years have attracted around eight applicants.
Professor Stephen Lee, director of the Centre for Voluntary
Sector Management at Henley Management College, is a former
chief executive of the Institute of Fundraising and spent
20 years in the voluntary sector. He also advocates the
MBA for charity professionals.
At Henley, core modules are typical MBA fare but case studies
are drawn equally from public, private and voluntary sectors,
to prepare managers to work across all three.
“The issues are exactly the same but in a different
context,” Lee says. “We try to make our MBA
relevant to the management challenges and opportunities
in each of the three sectors.”
Around 10 per cent of Henley’s students come from
a non-profit background. Lee feels the MBA brings them into
closer contact with business. “Charity courses ghettoise
non-profits. In trying to do something special for people
they are marginalising them,” he says.
Top
MVAs
Professor Alexander Murdock might disagree. Five years ago
London South Bank University launched the MVA as “an
MBA for the voluntary sector”. Murdock was an MBA
course director prior to joining LSBU and says the main
purpose is the same. “The MVA picks up very much on
management, finance, HR, marketing, and strategy,”
he says.
But students can also expect a grounding in charity law
and governance. Murdock believes a tailored course helps
students cope with unique challenges facing the sector,
such as precarious funding and organisational security.
“[Charities] are perpetually vulnerable,” he
says. “The MVA provides charity managers with practical
skills and knowledge.” Students come from organisations
of all sizes, most employing around 10 or 20 people. Many
are chief executives looking to grow their charities.
Trustees also benefit from the course, especially those
who hail from the private sector, he says. “Though
the trustees affect to know it, they are often fairly flaky
on aspects of legal issues and governance.”
For chief executives in small charities the ability to get
business acumen is especially important, he says. “Small
charities say ‘we don’t need HR’, but
charities appear in industrial tribunals [a lot more often
than] you would expect.”
Designed with charities in mind, the MVA is priced at under
£4,000 and does not include MBA extras such as a foreign
study trip. Murdock does not feel that students lose out.
“The MBA market has become heavily over-hyped. Even
a ‘blue chip’ business school does not assure
you of success.”
At Cass Business School, four masters’ programmes
have sprung up alongside the MBA at the Centre for Charity
Effectiveness. The most popular is in voluntary sector management,
says Professor Paul Palmer, the course director. Others
focus on marketing and fundraising, accounting and finance,
and grant-making. But all share a common two thirds to encourage
interdisciplinary working, Palmer says.
“Charity people tend to work in functions. We believe
there is a common body of knowledge which all charity managers
should have.”
The most striking departure from the traditional MBA is
social policy, studied at both Cass and LSBU. At Cass, MBA
tutors contextualise their teaching for the voluntary sector.
“For example, tax carries complications around Gift
Aid and VAT; governance is very different with an unpaid
board of governors,” Palmer explains.
Student experiences
Sarah Illingworth, the director of search and selection
at People Unlimited, a charity recruitment firm, had been
a trustee for 15 years when she undertook the part-time
MVA at LSBU to learn theory to underpin her experience.
“I’d taken organisations through mergers and
given advice on governance and structure. I learnt on the
job, but it got to the point where I thought ‘am I
doing this right?’”
The MVA was an intellectual tool, she says. “It gave
me a formal structure for writing a business plan, for example,
rather than relying on gut instinct”. As an MVA student
she had the opportunity to write a charity-focused dissertation
(Do voluntary trustee boards add value?). Making charity
contacts should not be underestimated, she says. “It’s
given me a great group of people to bounce ideas off of.”
Illingworth never considered the MBA. “I didn’t
want to learn about investment banking – I needed
to know SORP 2005, strategic management, how to make a balanced
scorecard work when you can’t measure profit.”
She admits questioning the value of a new qualification.
“I did think, ‘no one’s heard of it’.
But as a recruiter, CVs that are tailored to what people
want to do are more powerful.”
Liz Neal, director of Mencap Cymru, has spent almost her
entire career in the voluntary sector. She chose the Cranfield
MBA to expose herself to a different way of thinking. “Each
sector has a set of assumptions that rule our decisions
and our behaviour. I wanted to step outside and see it through
other people’s eyes.”
With issues such as corporate social responsibility and
private sector alliances ever more prevalent, Neal felt
that a business qualification would enable her to talk to
those on the other side. Most of her staff are employed
through services contracts with the public sector. “I
thought that if I were going to have a career in the voluntary
sector then I needed to understand what people from other
sectors expect,” she says.
Getting to grips with the language of business was not easy,
but things that seemed least relevant turned out to hold
the greatest scope for innovation. “We only talk about
full cost recovery, but looking at other pricing models
was really interesting.”
She recalls some of the reactions from MBA classmates. “Some
people said ‘I don’t believe in charities, the
government should do it. Others were amazed – they
had no idea of the complexity of what we do.” Nevertheless,
she cites the opportunity to influence business colleagues
as an enjoyable part of the experience.
Paradoxically, Neal finished her MBA more charity oriented
than before. “Now I know absolutely why I’m
in the sector, that my value base is what motivates me.
The challenge and complexity is why I’m here,”
she says.
Top
To return to the June 08 features list click here
|