Search
 
 
Focus on: insurance

Voluntary protection


 
Charities depend heavily on volunteer workers, but are they afforded second-class treatment compared to paid employees when it comes to insurance cover? Graham Buck finds out
 
Oxfam welcomed a well-known commercial name as a recruit to its volunteer workforce last month. Topshop’s former brand director Jane Shepherdson, who will help the charity develop its ethical fashion business, is the latest example of top talent willing to offer their services voluntarily.

And charities are attracting voluntary workers from an increasingly diverse base. They range from young people willing to spend a gap year helping a cause and those who have years of working experience who decide to take a career break, to senior citizens who have retired but are still fit and wish to put something back into the community.

Smaller charities will always be reliant on volunteer staff as they lack the money and resources for a large paid workforce. This raises the question of how they are regarded for insurance purposes.

The Charity Commission’s guide Charities and Insurance addresses the issue of insuring volunteers, noting that their rights and positions may differ from those of the charity’s paid employees. Volunteers should be given adequate training and supervision and both they and those that they come into contact with during the course of their work should be “afforded care for their well being”. This includes the duties imposed by legislation such as the Health and Safety at Work Act.

The Commission suggests that charity trustees regard volunteers as being employees for insurance purposes, which means including them under its employers’ liability (EL) and public liability (PL) coverages. It also recommends that the policy definition of the term ‘volunteer’ be checked and that the charity keeps records of individuals working for it that come within the definition.

Insurer Zurich recommends that charities also consider personal accident cover, to provide compensation should a volunteer suffer accident or assault while going about his or her work, and money insurance if volunteers are involved in handling money or taking it to the bank.

Paul Emery, Zurich’s head of charities and the voluntary sector, says that a charity’s PL cover automatically covers voluntary workers, but EL cover has to be specifically extended. “Certainly, if there is any element of a contract – even if only verbal – between the charity and a worker then it is advisable to have EL, particularly when that worker carries out a task regularly and to a specific standard,” he suggests.

However, it is up to the charity to make the decision as to whether they wish to afford voluntary staff the same benefits as paid employees, and this includes whether to provide them with EL cover.

“Zurich also takes the view that insurance should be made simple, so we offer a standard package, which would include EL, PL, motor, personal accident and money,” says Emery. This offers a cost saving over buying the covers individually.

“We’ve sought to remove any potential barriers from our products and services that might stand in the way of encouraging voluntary work,” he adds.

However, he points out that covering voluntary workers while outside of the UK requires more individual underwriting. While a regional charity carrying out local work can be easily provided with a package policy, overseas work has to be considered much more on a case-by-case basis.

Steve Carroll, managing director of Markel (UK), an insurer of social welfare risks including charities, agrees that insurers need to understand the charity they are insuring. Markel’s policies automatically cater for volunteers under the EL and general liability sections, but also provide extended employment practices protection.

The latter cover caters for potential employment disputes between employer (the Charity) and employee in areas such as unfair dismissal and discrimination. This is because while most charities recognise that they have legal responsibilities to employees on the payroll, they often do not appreciate that the same legislation may apply in respect of their volunteers.

“Charities have to be very careful when agreeing how they reimburse volunteers for out of pocket expenses, so as not to create what may later be deemed by an Employment Tribunal to be a formal contract of employment,” adds Carroll.

“Only when a volunteer takes the charity to a tribunal will they know whether or not they did things right, as the tribunal will decide if the volunteer should be deemed an employee for the purposes of the claim. Our policy therefore responds in respect of employees and volunteers accordingly”.

Top

Career break workers

The decision on whether to buy EL cover for volunteer workers was particularly difficult four or five years ago, when rates moved sharply higher for commercial and non-profit organisations alike.

“There has been a perception by some insurers that charities represent a risky business, as workers are often dealing with vulnerable people in potentially dangerous situations,” observes Chris Pitt, spokesperson for Ecclesiastical Insurance.

However, he adds that not only have EL rates softened in the past few years, but dialogue between insurers and non-profit organisations has provided a better understanding of the activities undertaken by charity workers.

Another reason for extending liability covers to volunteer workers is the change in societal attitudes. Charities are still held in considerable esteem by the general public, but suing them is no longer regarded as taboo. Aware of the compensation culture, most ensure that volunteers receive suitable training before they take up their work: “Charities are becoming much more professional,” comments Pitt.

VSO, the international development charity that works through volunteers, practices stringent risk management, according to its insurance administrator, Mike Goodwin, who says it ensures that the right individuals are selected and they know what to expect before starting work.

And while VSO has an emergency policy ready to get volunteer workers out of danger zones quickly, it hasn’t had to be employed too often.

The organisation’s application procedure, which includes a medical assessment, occupies a period of up to one year. Successful applicants then undergo a training period of three to four months before placement. However, VSO also offers a number of short-term volunteer programmes ranging from two weeks to between three and six months.

Goodwin says that VSO’s own experience has been a gradual rise in the average age of volunteers over the years. It now stands at around 40, due partly to the growing number of people taking a year or two out from their regular employment. The number of volunteers, which dipped in the wake of the 11 September terrorist attacks, is now back on the rise.

And despite reports of rising EL rates, the organisation’s biggest insurance problem proved to be medical insurance costs, which soared as a result of 9/11.

“We continually review our insurance programme for voluntary staff and carried out the most recent one at Christmas when it was recommended that we consider kidnap and ransom insurance,” reports Goodwin. “In the past, only commercial organisations were targeted, but charities can no longer assume they are exempt.

“We took out directors’ and officers’ liability cover last year for the first time as there is a potential, albeit fairly limited, for damaging claims.”

Working in the danger zones

One of the companies specialising in providing travel and emergency medical insurance for volunteer workers and missionary aid workers involved in overseas projects is Banner Financial Services. Staff have regularly joined voluntary teams involved in short-term projects, recent examples including Sierra Leone and Sudan. The company also recently provided insurance for American nationals working on a Darfur humanitarian relief project, who were experiencing problems in obtaining cover.

Robin Williams, a director of Banner, reports that it insures around 10,000 voluntary workers each year. Customers range from individuals from local church groups, who may bear the cost of cover themselves, to organisations such as the Salvation Army.

“We provide travel cover suited to their particular needs, rather than that provided by a standard policy,” he says. “Premiums tend to be higher, but the level of cover is appropriate and applies for the duration of their work period.”

He adds that the company’s underwriter has a good understanding of the risks and is able to assess areas of the world requiring special consideration, such as war zones. While high-risk areas attract higher rates, the company’s policy is to offer cover that is often unavailable in the wider market and to ensure that the cost is not prohibitive.

Banner typically writes a 12-month contract. An individual working as a volunteer for a longer period would therefore receive an annual policy renewable at the end of each year. Williams adds that the company is receiving a steady rise in requests to cover items of business equipment such as computers and expects this to grow further.

And while some individual claims have proved expensive, such as for repatriation, emergency medical treatment and airlifting volunteer workers, the underwriting experience overall has been good.

He admits that one problem is the increasing number of voluntary workers aged 75 and over. Although improved health and fitness means many are ready and able to offer their services, as with travel insurance for older people vacationing, cover is not readily available due to the risk of what can still be sizeable medical bills. A possible option is to scale down the cover and benefits offered, rather than decline cover entirely.


Top

To return to the July-Aug 07 features list click here

 
current magazine cover
 
 
 Home
 News
 E Newsalert 
 Events
 Subscribe
 Charity services
 Past issues
 Factsheets
 Site map
 
 
navigation jobs
navigation UK Charity Awards
navigation Charity Buyers Guide