Search
 
 
Investment Quarterly - Q3 06:
Currency as an asset class


 
Whether an actively managed segregated mandate, or one of the new unitised funds now available, Iain Morse investigates the benefits of currency as an asset class in its own right, and the various ways it can be managed to produce the best returns
 
Promising returns with a low correlation to other asset classes, currency has come into its own right. It is being used by a growing number of larger pension funds and charities to generate absolute returns and to diversify existing portfolios.

But active currency management is not widely understood. Part of the reason for this is its complexity. Currency traders do not measure their returns in relative, but in absolute terms. Risk and return tolerances are agreed in advance with the investor. Active currency management also polarises around two core approaches, fundamental or technical, although in truth most managers use a combination of both to varying degrees.

“Technical trading is driven by past exchange rate data, and fundamental trading by economic market data,” observes Bill Muyskin, senior consultant and currency expert at Mercer Investment Consulting. Each approach can be further characterised as predominantly quant or judgemental. Quant uses pre-programmed trading; judgemental, as its name implies, allows for decisive human intervention.

Of the 117 managers measured by Mercer in their currency universe, most use some blend of technical and fundamental. By the same token, even the most rigorous quant must allow for intervention when unique, market-moving events take place, and the most opinionated judgemental manager will still consult a model against which to test themselves.

This highlights a fundamental point about the active management of currency. “There is no single process or style that you can say is dominant and best,” argues Mike Victoros, head of global FX products at ABN Amro. “We have been lucky that our relatively judgemental approach works well in the current environment.” Some examples bear this out. At Oppenheim Asset Management, one of Germany’s leading active currency managers, only 15 currencies are traded, mostly developed ones. “Our model throws out a plus, minus or neutral,” says their currency chief Christian Walde, “We can go against it within pre-determined limits.”

Top

Meanwhile Credit Suisse Asset Management has a somewhat different decision taking process. This attributes 60 per cent of each decision to fundamentals and 40 per cent to behavioural or short-term factors. Within the 60 per cent, more than half (35 per cent of total) is attributed to macro-economic variables, 10 per cent to aggregate flows of money, and 15 per cent to fundamental quantitative analysis and forecasting. Of the remaining 40 per cent, just over half (more than 25 per cent of total) is technical analysis using charts, and the remaining 15 per cent to market sentiment. By contrast to Oppenheim, CSAM trades more than 20 currencies, particularly emerging ones, and they expect to increase this number in future.

These two examples illustrate the difference in sophistication between the models used by different managers. For instance, managers no longer only form their views on currency pairs, but some instead take an absolute approach, valuing currencies individually then blending these valuations into pairs. Research from Hymans Robertson finds that managers are split almost equally between pairwise, absolute and some blend of the two.

Needless to say, the size of the set of currency pairs traded by any manager is an important clue as to their resources and aspirations. As a rule of thumb, this market breaks down into two groups; those that trade only developed currencies and those that trade a wider range including the main emerging currencies.

Charities seeking exposure to actively managed currency have the same options as UK pension schemes. Segregated mandates require a small initial cash commitment because of the leverage used by the currency traders. However, investors must pass a credit worthiness test because if the manager loses money on their account, the investor has to pay up the relevant amount. In good years, of course, investors receive profits from the currency manager.

A growing number of managers, including BGI and PIMCO, already have or are launching unitised currency funds. These actively trade currencies but like any other unitised fund the investors’ total exposure is their initial investment. Also, trustees need to do far less due diligence and do not need to construct a detailed mandate. Either way, currency deserves consideration for use as a new asset class by UK charities.

Top
 
current magazine cover
 
 
 Home
 News
 E Newsalert 
 Events
 Subscribe
 Charity services
 Past issues
 Factsheets
 Site map
 
 
navigation jobs
navigation UK Charity Awards
navigation Charity Buyers Guide