By Andrew Holt

A new report has revealed the true cost of financial fraud within the National Health Service.

In collaboration with the think-tank 2020Health, the accountancy firm PKF, and the University of Portsmouth, the report reveals that the total cost of fraud could be as high as £3 billion per year.

The findings are likely to be seized upon by supporters of the government’s NHS reforms, who have long argued that NHS management has to change.

The report’s authors argue that reducing fraud losses is one of the least painful ways to improve efficiency because tackling fraud incurs very little cost when compared with expenses such as procurement, staffing and utilities.

Commenting on the report, Julia Manning, chief executive of 2020Heath, said: “These figures are really quote astonishing. Whether we’re talking about patients abusing the prescription service or hospitals claiming for phantom operations, the total cost of fraud within the NHS is an eye-watering amount.

“Anyone who still claims that the NHS does not need to reform should ask themselves whether £3billion a year is an acceptable price to pay for looking the other way.”

One of the report’s lead authors, Jim Gee, director of Counter Fraud Services at PKF, is a former director of Counter Fraud Services for the Department of Health.

He said: “Fraud can be hugely damaging to any organisation, but especially so to a taxpayer funded body that is responsible for the health of over 60 million people.

“The current official estimate of losses to the NHS - £165 million or around 0.15% of expenditure - would mean that it was 20 times better protected against fraud than any other healthcare organisation internationally.

"This is not credible. Our view is that it would be reasonable to assume that the NHS is no worse or better protected than the best found examples elsewhere, with loses of around 3% of its budget or just over £3 billion per year.

“The NHS has been tasked with finding efficiency savings of £20 billion over the next few years, and so minimising fraud has the potential to improve the quality of healthcare for everyone in this country.”

At present, NHS Trusts are only required to demonstrate that someone is responsible for countering fraud, but they are under no obligation to provide details of how successful they are or to publish information relating to fraud and its costs.

Manning added: “NHS management urgently needs to tackle fraud and to do so in an open way that inspires the confidence of the public.”

The report details examples of common fraud within the NHS, and these include:

Misdirection of resources: one finance manager was found to have placed their entire family on the payroll.

Personal impropriety, such as one CEO who over-claimed on his mileage allowance by 55,000 miles.

Dentists have claimed for fillings which were in fact nickel, and have claimed fees for opening their surgery out of hours, without actually doing this.

Patients lie about their country of origin in widespread abuse of what is known as “health tourism.”

Opticians have been found to claim fees for performing tests on people who were subsequently found to have been dead.

The report notes that healthcare fraud can be carried out by managers, staff, healthcare professionals, patients and contractors.

Manning concluded: “It is never easy to admit that fraud on this scale takes place, but the first step to reducing it is to stop being in denial.”

Home     More News


Other stories you may find of interest:

Sector verdict on the Open Public Services White Paper
The Government's modernisation of public services and promise to give people choice and control over the services they use, and end the ‘get what you’re given’ culture, has been met with sector responses that range from the lukewarm to ice cold. ACEVO warned about facing down vested interests, NCVO complemented the paper on a useful start but also the need for a level playing field, a message reiterated by the Social Enterprise Coalition in more forceful terms, and CAF noted that commissioners at all levels need to be truly empowered to value social impact...

Health charities win awards for life changing work
Eight charities have all won GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) IMPACT Awards for their contributions to improving the UK’s health, The King’s Fund and GSK announce today. GSK’s accolade, run in partnership with The King’s Fund, awards £25,000 for each organisation, providing essential funding during a time of financial challenges, and training to take their organisation to the next level.

Ten charities to get health awards
Ten award-winning charities will tonight each receive £25,000 in recognition of their outstanding work in addressing some of the most difficult health issues and improving health care in some of the UK's most deprived communities. The GSK IMPACT Awards, a partnership with independent health charity The King's Fund, celebrate the vital contribution made by the voluntary sector to improving health care in the UK. The winners - which range from a project working with young homeless people to a service offering support to women and girls who have experienced gendered violence including childhood sexual abuse and rape - will be awarded their prizes at a ceremony at the Science Museum in London tonight.




Aug/Sept cover story: The EU and civil society

The European Union is one of the largest donors to civil society in the world, but also accused of not truly engaging with sector organisations. Peter Davy investigates the EU/sector relationship


Current struggles over the Eurozone debt crisis have done little to endear the EU to British voters, it seems. Two polls in July had half the population saying they would vote to leave were a referendum held. In the survey by pollsters AngusReid, only a third thought EU membership had been positive for the country...

December/January 2012 Cover Feature: The Good Leader

With morale in the sector at its lowest ebb, Duncan Jefferies asks what makes an effective leader and how charities can attract and develop the best management talent in the current environment

This website is a part of Perspective Publishing Limited, registered in England No 2876166.