By Andrew Holt

Lord Low of Dalston has called on the Government to protect mobility payments for disabled people living in residential care, in his independent review report published today.

Lord Low said: “If payment of the mobility component to people living in residential care ends, this will be a serious step backwards for disability rights.”

Over 800 submissions were made to the 12-week independent review into how the personal mobility needs of people living in state-funded residential care are met.

Leading disability charities, Leonard Cheshire Disability and Mencap, asked Lord Low to conduct the review, including gathering extensive written evidence, oral evidence sessions, wider policy analysis and site visits.

Evidence from individuals living in state-funded residential care and their families, care providers and local authorities all went into producing Lord Low’s review of the issue.

The key findings of the review report are:

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) mobility component, or its successor under Personal Independence Payment (PIP), should be retained. Its removal would lead to a loss of independence for disabled people

The report found no evidence of a duplication of funding in relation to the mobility needs being met by local authorities and those being met by DLA mobility.

There needs to be greater clarity of local authorities’ responsibilities for funding mobility needs and the role played by DLA mobility.

Lord Low continued: “Everyone has mobility needs, but we know that many disabled people face additional costs or require support in meeting these needs. What people stressed to the Review is how fundamental mobility is in securing other key rights. It enables people to participate in their community, gain an education, and maintain a family life or work.

“The report makes some important recommendations that should help ensure that disabled people are able to exercise their right to mobility in the same manner as non-disabled people.”

The Welfare Reform Bill currently gives Government the power to stop paying the mobility component of the Personal Independence Payment (which is set to replace Disability Living Allowance) to 78,000 people living in residential care. It has already passed through the House of Commons and is currently being debated in the House of Lords.

Lord Low’s review was designed to create an opportunity for an independent, public and comprehensive examination of how the mobility needs of people living in residential care are met.

It runs in parallel to the Government’s own internal review into the proposed removal of the mobility component of Personal Independence Payment from disabled people living in residential care.

One of the members of the Review’s Steering Group, Wendy Tiffin, said: “I became involved with the Low Review because, being disabled myself and reliant on a wheelchair to get me out and about, I felt it was important that disabled people should be represented.

“Many people need support with personal mobility in residential care as this gives them the opportunity to be independent and to mix with other people.”

To find out more about the review and to submit evidence, visit here.

Home     More News


Other stories you may find of interest:

David Cameron: Leadership for a better Britain
David Cameron put the Big Society at the heart of his keynote conference speech yesterday, stating: "My driving mission in politics is to build a Big Society, a stronger society." He said: "It starts with families. I want to make this the most family-friendly government the country has ever seen. More childcare. More health visitors. More relationship support. More help with parenting. And for the 120,000 families that are most troubled - and causing the most trouble - a commitment to turn their lives around by the end of this Parliament."

Budget 2011: Sector verdict is broadly positive
The sector has given its verdict on the budget, and there is much positive comment, but this is tempered by some disappointment and criticism. The Chancellor’s budget speech did herald some significant – and in some cases unexpected – changes to the reliefs available for charities and philanthropists. Key measures announced in the Budget include proposals to simplify Gift Aid, encourage wealthy people to give more to charity...

Sector expresses disappointment at 2012 Budget
After last year’s positive Budget for charities, the sector has expressed deep disappointment at the Chancellor George Osborne's 2012 Budget. The CFG described it as a budget for business, CAF warned tax changes could strangle major donations, the Charity Tax Group said it was very concerned about some of the Budget announcements, law firm Withers warned that the Budget could be a significant attack on charity funding, NCVO said this is not “George’s Marvellous Medicine” for the charity sector, NAVCA has warned the budget should have gone further, ACEVO is worried by the cap on tax reliefs, Citizens Advice Scotland has said there is nothing in the Budget to help people struggling and Justice for All said the budget revealed there is no long term plan for the advice sector.




Aug/Sept cover story: The EU and civil society

The European Union is one of the largest donors to civil society in the world, but also accused of not truly engaging with sector organisations. Peter Davy investigates the EU/sector relationship


Current struggles over the Eurozone debt crisis have done little to endear the EU to British voters, it seems. Two polls in July had half the population saying they would vote to leave were a referendum held. In the survey by pollsters AngusReid, only a third thought EU membership had been positive for the country...

December/January 2012 Cover Feature: The Good Leader

With morale in the sector at its lowest ebb, Duncan Jefferies asks what makes an effective leader and how charities can attract and develop the best management talent in the current environment

This website is a part of Perspective Publishing Limited, registered in England No 2876166.